KEADILAN BAGI ISTRI AKIBAT PUTUSAN BATAL DEMI HUKUM
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Marriage is carried out in order to create a happy and eternal family according to based on the hand of God. However, sometimes divorce must be exist as it was desired by the husband. Accordingly, he submitted a plea of divorce to the Religious Court to obtain an aproval. As he obtained the aproval from Religious court to divorce his wife, the husband disobeyed the court orders until the time limit was expired. Of course, it lead to the injustice gained by the wife.
Accordingly, the current research focused on three aspects, namely (1) the legal consequences of verdict with no pronouncing of a divorce pledge. (2) The marital status of both the husband and the wife as the jurisprudence has been void and (3) The justice for the wife because the verdict has been expired due to disobedience carried out by the husband.
Normative research with case study design was accomplished in this study.
The finding revealed that the verdict with no statement of divorce pledge carried out by the husband before the deadline will not bring about effects for both the claiment (husband) or the defendant (wife). In other word, the marital status did not change as they were still legally married. In line with justice, the wife was aggrieved by the husband, and she did not gain justice either on her marital status, rights and legal certainty.
Downloads
Article Details
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
References
Anshary MK. Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2003.
Azwar, Sarifuddin. Metodologi Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2003.
Daud Ali, Muhammad. Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 1997.
Ghozoli, Abdul Rahman. Fiqih Munakahat, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Permata Press, 2003.
Laksmi Anindita, Sri dan Lazuardi Adnan. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sebagai Dasar Pengajuan Guagatan Perbuatan Melawah Hukum Terkait Pelaksanaan Uang Pengganti, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 1 (Maret, 2017).
Lubis, Sulaikin. Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Manan, Abdul dan M. Fauzan. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
Moh. Kasiram, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif-Kuantitatif, Yogyakarta: UIN Maliki Press, 2010.
Mujib, Abdul. Gugurnya Kekuatan Putusan Pengadilan Agama.
Nuruddin, Amiur dan Azhari Akmal Taringan. Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.
Rajafi, Ahmad. Nalar Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Istana Publishing, 2015.
Ropaun, Rambe dan A. Mukri Agafi. Implementasi Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Perca, 2001.
Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqhus Sunnah, Jakarta: Pena Pundi Aksara, 2006.
Saebani, Beni Ahmad. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2008.
Soekanto, SoerjoNo. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press, 2008.
Sugeng, Bambang dan Sujayadi. Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Dokumen Litigasi Perkara Perdata, Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Sugiono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2014.
Zuhriah, Erfaniah. Peradilan Agama Indonesia, Sejarah Pemikiran dan Realita, Malang: Setara Press, 2014.