PENOLAKAN UMAT TERHADAP RISALAH KENABIAN DAN RELEVANSINYA DENGAN PENOLAKAN MUSLIM TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN
The people reject the prophetic treatise, just as some Indonesian people reject the enactment of Law No.1 of 1974 on Marriage (UUP). The question is whether there is relevance between these two objections. The results of research show there is relevance between the two. The relevance found was that both were rejected because they brought a change. People reject change, the same as some Indonesian society also rejects change. The people want establishment, the same as some Indonesian want establishment. The background of rejection is lack of understanding of the changes brought about. So the task of the prophets throughout his life is to understand the people. Most of the prophets succeeded in understanding and finally the people accepted the message of the prophetic message, but some were not understood. In line with the duties of the prophets, the task of observers, thinkers, and experts in Indonesian Islamic Family Law is to understand Indonesian society about the status of the UUP. That the UUP and related regulations are Indonesian Islamic sharia. That the UUP and related regulations are Indonesian Islamic law. That the UUP and related regulations are the same status as fiqh, fatwa, jurisprudent and interpretation, both the results of ijtihad, both the results of thought, are equally the results of understanding nash (istinbath). Even the UUP is actually a result of collective thought (ijmâ‘), while fiqh, fatwa, jurisprudence are the result of individual thought (ijtihad fardi). Although there is a collective fatwa, the number of mujtahids involved is still very limited compared to the experts involved in formulating and stipulating UUP.
Arif Nuh Safri, “Otentisitas Risalah Kenabian (Pluralisme dan Kemanusiaan)”, ESENSIA: Jurnal FUPI, UIN Suka Yogyakarta, Vol. XIII No. (1 Januari 2012), hlm. 167-186.
Arso Sosroatmodjo dan A. Wasit Aulawi, Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia, cet. ke 2. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1978
Barbara N. Ramusack and Sharon Sievers, Women In Asia. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1988.
Cora Vreede-de Stuers, “The Life of Rankayo Rohmah El-Yunusia: The Fact and The Image), dalam Elsbeth Lecher-Scholten and Anke Niehof, eds. Indonesian Women in Focus: Past and Present Notions (Dordrecht: Foris Publication, 1987), hlm. 52, 57.
Eni Zulaiha, “Fenomena Nabi dan Kenabian dalam Perspektif Alquran”, dalam Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 1, 2 (Desember 2016), hlm. 149-164.
H.U. Pelita, 4 Maret 1999, hlm. 2.
Hamim Ilyas, “Islam Risalah Rahmat dalam al-Qur’an (Tafsir Q.S. Al-Anbiya (21):107”, Hermeneia: Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Juli-Desember 2017).
Khoiruddin Nasution, “Dasar Wajib Mematuhi Undang-Undang Perkawinan (UUP): Studi Pemikiran Muhammad ‘Abduh”, dalam ADHKI: Journal of Islamic Family Law, Vol. 1, Nomor 1, Juni 2019 (Januari-Juni 2019), hlm. 1-16. URL: http://jurnal.adhkiindonesia.or.id/index.php/ADHKI/article/view/8/1.
Khoiruddin Nasution, Status Wanita di Asia Tenggara: Studi terhadap Perundang-undangan Perkawinan Muslim Kontemporer Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jakarta: INIS, 2002.
M. B. Hooker, Islamic Law In South-East Asia. Oxford, New York, Singapore; Oxford University Press, 1984.
Murtadha Muthohhari, Falsafah Kenabian, terj. Ahsin Muhammad, cet ke-1. Jakarta: Pustaka Risalah, 1991.
Nurlena Rifai, “Muslim Women in Indonesia`s Politics: An Historical Examination of the Political Career of Aisyah Aminy”. Montreal: Tesis MA pada McGill University 1993
Salamah Noorhidayati, “Menguak Fakta Kenabian Maryam AS”, YIN YANG. Vol. 9 No. 1 (Januari-Juni 2014), hlm. 19-36.
Siti Malaiha Dewi, “Kontektualisasi Misi Risalah Kenabian dalam Menangkal Radikalisme”, FIKRAH: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan, Volume 3, No. 2, (Desember 2015), hlm. 349-369.
Wikipedia.org. subjek BP4. Akses Senin 23 Maret 2020.
Lisan al-‘Arab, Abdullah ibn Mandhur. Beirut: Dar al-Sadir, t.t.), VI: 561.
Kamur Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Tim Perumus, ed ke-2. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1994
Copyright (c) 2020 Khoiruddin Nasution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).